This page describes US Tax rules that apply to Controlled Foreign Corporations (CFCs)
Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC): If more than 50% of a foreign corporation is owned by US Shareholders (as defined below), that foreign corporation is a CFC, which triggers not only increased disclosure on Form 5471, but also potential liability to the US Shareholder for US tax on undistributed income of the CFC.
US Shareholder: A US person (any US taxpayer – citizen, resident, corporation, partnership, etc.) that owns 10% or more (by either value or voting power) of a foreign corporation is a US Shareholder of that foreign corporation and is required to disclose their ownership on Form 5471 (the extent of disclosure will depend on how much is owned and whether the foreign corporation is a CFC). There are attribution rules to keep shareholders from splitting ownership between related parties to stay below the ownership threshold.
Foreign entities rarely fit exactly into the definitions in the US tax code. Some entities are per se corporations - that is they must be reported as a corporation on a US tax return. Other entities qualify for an election to be classified as either a corporation or a disregarded entity.
- more detail including code references and form numbers are needed for this section
Form 5471
- more detail and/or links needed
When Congress enacted the CFC rules in 1962, the idea was to ensure that easily mobile passive income wasn't stashed in foreign corporations in order to avoid US tax. The subpart F rules require a US Shareholder of a CFC to include passive income and personal holding company income in their current US taxable income regardless of whether the income was distributed to the US shareholder. Generally, US tax on any active business income could be deferred until the CFC distributed the income to the US Shareholder, but passive income was taxable immediately. TCJA did not materially change the subpart F rules; instead it added the §965 transition tax and §951A GILTI as a parallel tax regime, included in US taxable income as if they were subpart F inclusions.
The 2017 tax reform bill added section 965 to the Internal Revenue Code. This section was written overly broadly, and affects the local corporations of US expats, not just the intended targets of Apple, Google and Microsoft.
Blog posts on the transition tax.
IRS Guidance:
This section serves as a technical appendix to the blog post Explaining GILTI - Measurement.
GILTI is found in §951A of the Internal Revenue Code. Note that the description below is general in nature. It ignores many of the problems that occur when a US taxpayer owns multiple CFCs or has to allocate expenses between tested income and income taxed under other provisions.
GILTI = Net CFC Tested Income - Net Deemed Tangible Income Return
It is computed at the US Shareholder level, aggregated across all CFCs in which the taxpayer is a US Shareholder.
Tested Income is defined as gross income less:
This essentially boils down to the net income of the CFC that has not already been subject to US tax. There is some controversy over what Congress intended by the high-tax exclusion (third bullet point above). This is the point argued on behalf of the Israeli Ministry of Finance in a public comment on the proposed regulations (see blog post).
DTIR = (10% of QBAI) - Interest Expense
QBAI is Qualified Business Asset Investment. To compute QBAI, first compute cost less depreciation (computed using US tax rules) of all depreciable assets used in the production of income. This computation is done on a quarterly basis over the year and QBAI is the average of these quarterly numbers. So, if the company’s tangible assets are old, the net value will be small. Leased assets don’t count, and neither do non-depreciable tangible assets such as inventory or land.
Base Scenario (all numbers in USD):
US Shareholder has one wholly owned CFC with the following
Assume that the CFC has no US source income and no subpart F income (all active business income). Also assume that only one CFC is owned and that the corporate shareholder has no domestic expenses that must be allocated to foreign source income under the FTC rules.
Corporation | Individual | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
No election | §962 Election | Old Rules | ||
Net Income before Tax | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
Local tax @ 25.00% | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 |
Net Income = Tested Income | 750 | 750 | 750 | 750 |
QBAI | 500 | 500 | 500 | |
Deemed Tangible Income Return | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
Foreign Tax Paid on GILTI | 233 | 233 | ||
80% FTC limitation | 187 | 187 | ||
GILTI | 700 | 700 | 700 | |
Plus Foreign Tax Paid (§78) | 233 | 233 | ||
Gross GILTI Inclusion | 933 | 700 | 933 | |
§250 deduction | 467 | 467 | ||
Net GILTI increase to taxable income | 467 | 700 | 467 | |
Tax (21% for corporation, 37% indiv) | 98 | 259 | 98 | |
FTC (smaller of Tax or 80% FTC limitation) | 98 | 0 | 98 | |
Net Increase to Tax | 0 | 259 | 0 | 0 |
Increase in PTEP | 700 | 700 | 0 | 0 |
Line by line explanations:
Of course, the initial taxation of GILTI is not the whole picture. At some point the US Shareholder will need to get the income out of the CFC, often by making a dividend distribution. The next table shows how the original taxation of GILTI affects the taxation of that subsequent distribution. The treatment of individual US Shareholders under previous law is included for comparison.
This example has been re-written to account for the proposed regulations on foreign tax credits. Much of the proposed regulations cover the detail of allocating expenses in affiliated groups - which will not apply to this simple example. However, the simple example had to be re-worked to account for the separate FTC baskets. TCJA added a GILTI FTC basket with no carryover or carryback of associated foreign tax paid or accrued. To the extent that PTEP is allocated to GILTI (that is, the portion of earnings previously taxed as GILTI and now distributed), the allocable foreign tax is placed in the GILTI FTC basket and can only offset current year US tax on GILTI. In addition, the PTEP ordering rules in Notice 2019-01 state that if there is any PTEP that is allocated to a previous §965 inclusion, then distributions are allocated to that PTEP first (with a haircut based on the §965(c) deduction). The end result is that Individual US shareholders who have NOT made a §962 election may have difficulty getting any benefit from foreign taxes paid on subsequent dividends. The following numbers assume that there is NO previous year PTEP, so all PTEP is from the table above. The example further assumes that the distribution is made in a year with NO GILTI inclusion - this is the worst case, as the foreign tax allocated to the GILTI basket is lost.
Yeah, it's confusing. Here's the Cliff Notes version of how to compute FTC:
The takeaway from this is that where timing differences mean that GILTI is taxed in the US in a different year than the foreign tax on the distribution of that income, there could be an excess foreign tax credit that will disappear - and the individual shareholder is essentially double taxed on that income. Since GILTI is an ongoing tax - it is possible to offset the US tax on GILTI in year X2 with foreign tax on distributions of GILTI from previous years. But, if distributions are not matched to GILTI every year, there will be double taxation at some point.
Furthermore, the actual computations depend heavily on what other types of income are in both your US return and your foreign return. This example is illustrative, but each individual taxpayer MUST do the computations based on their own personal situation.
Subsequent Dividend (in a year with zero GILTI): | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Corporation | Individual | |||
No election | §962 Election | Old Rules | ||
Income to distribute | 750 | 750 | 750 | 750 |
PTEP | 700 | 0 | 0 | |
§245A deduction and/or PTEP | 750 | |||
Net taxable | 0 | 50 | 750 | 750 |
Tax at 20% (assume qualified dividend) | 0 | 10 | 150 | 150 |
Less FTC (see below) | 0 | 8 | 113 | 113 |
Net tax | 0 | 2 | 37 | 37 |
NIIT | 29 | 29 | 29 | |
Total US Tax Payable on Dividend | 0 | 31 | 66 | 66 |
Total tax on Dividend | 144 | 179 | 179 | |
FTC Computation: | ||||
Foreign Tax Paid at 15% | 113 | 113 | 113 | |
FTC Allocated to GILTI Basket (Limit=0) | 105 | |||
FTC Allowed - GILTI | 0 | 0 | ||
FTC Allocated to General Basket | 8 | 113 | 113 | |
FTC Allowed - General | 8 | 113 | 113 | |
Total Tax Div + GILTI + Corporate | 250 | 653 | 429 | 429 |
Effective Tax Rate (US + Foreign) | 25.00% | 65.25% | 42.85% | 42.85% |
Total Tax if not US taxpayer | 363 | 363 | 363 | |
Cost of CBT | 290 | 66 | 66 | |
Percent of pre-tax corporate income | 29.00% | 6.60% | 6.60% |
Line by line explanations:
Another numerical example is available on YouTube.